Let's keep it real. We are getting inundated by new content, some of it we get right to, but sometimes the topic area is a bit over our heads, so we read it once, twice, three times and it still doesn't sink in.
This happens a lot with content that is technical in nature and quite over my head. The first example I can think of was when Mike King first posted about vector embeddings. Or every time I am with Britney Mueller, Dana DiTomaso, etc etc...
I assumed this post from Mike was smart because of the source, I also looked at the words...vector embeddings, vectorizing, embedding model, token limits, hugging face and the dreaded custom JavaScript and thought...nope, not my pay grade.
Everything he said, sounded smart AND was over my head!
So 3-4 months later I finally connected some of the dots after many conversations and about 15% of the ideas clicked.
Fast forward to yesterday...it happened again... this time it was Simo Ahava's turn to drop something that I feel I should read, learn from and know but just didn't have the time to process the real question...
The real question is
Is there anything in this post that this thought leader (Simo / Dana) just dropped that I should pay attention to?
The question lingered, and the time is short. So here is what my prompt in ChatGPT 4o:
And here were the responses:
Smart blog posts instantly contextualized with ChatGPT memory
Now no hallucinations here, these are real things I've been talking about with ChatGPT, and they are stored in memory. While there is no Simo-Bot for me to chat with, at least it takes the inspiration from what he's done in this post and connects it to things I've been talking about.
But using ChatGPT it is pretty easy to dump all of someone's posts into a Custom GPT and see what they would say about these responses, which we showed here on the difference SEO advice from the generic training data of ChatGPT vs what Rand Fishkin and I might say.
Wanna Go Deeper?
Build a CustomGPT of your favorite thought leaders and why that might be valuable.
